NOAH, WHAT REALLY DID HAPPEN WHEN HE AWOKE, RIGHTLY DIVIDING THE WORD OF TRUTH

THERE HAS BEEN MUCH CONFUSION, REGARDING THIS EVENT IN THE BOOK OF GENESIS.

PREPARED AND RESEARCHED BY, SAM MARTINO

THE CRITICS [AND I MAY ADD] SOME SINCERE CRISTIANS AND BIBLE TEACHERS, HAD AND ARE TRADITIONALLY TEACHING THAT NOAH WAS SEXUALLY ABUSED BY HIS SON [HAM] AND GO AS FAR AS CLAIMING [INCEST] WAS COMMITTED. THERE REASONS FOR SUCH A FOOLISH CLAIM ARE THAT WHEN NOAH AWOKE FROM HIS INTOXICATED STATE, THAT HE KNEW WHAT HIS SON [HAM HAD DONE UNTO HIM. SO HERE WE GO, I WILL QUOTE THE ENTIRE TEXT USING THE KING JAMES BIBLE, AND COMMENT AND CLARIFY WHAT I BELEIVE ARE FOOLISH ERRORS ON THEIR PART, BY FORCING A FALSE NARRATIVE OF INCEST WHEN IN FACT, IT WAS NEVER IMPIED, OR STATED BY THE VICTIM [ NOAH] NOW WHO BETTER THAN THE ACTUAL EYEWITTNESS HIMSELF AND LETS NOT FORGET THAT THE HOLY SPIRIT OF TRUTH IS THE ONE WHO IS ACTUALLY RESPONSIBLE FOR EVERY PURE WORD IN THE TEXT. AFTER ALL, NOT ONE WORD GETS WRITTEN WITHOUT THE HOLY SPIRIT NOT SOMEONES ERRONEOUS CLAIMS BY EXTRAPULATION, SO THAT MAKES 2 NOAH AND THE HOLY SPIRIT.

I HOWEVER WILL BASE THIS STUDY ON THE TRUTH OF GOD

TO DO THIS PROPERLY AND OF COURSE SCRIPTURELY WE MUST USE THE TEXT ITSELF, ON THE MATTER OF NAKEDNESS, AND THERE ARE PLENTY OF OTHER SCRIPTURES THAT CAN BE QUOTED TO SUPPORT THIS TRUTH. NAKEDNESS IS MENTIONED IN THIS CHAPTER ALONE, 22 TIMES THATS HOW IMPORTANT OF A TOPIC IT IS TO GOD, NOT TO MENTION OTHER PLACES IN SCRIPPTURE.

GENESIS CHAPTER 9 And the sons of Noah, that went forth of the ark, were Shem, and Ham, and Japheth: and Ham is the father of Canaan. THAT IS THE POSITIONAL ORDER OF RANK

19These are the three sons of Noah: and of them was the whole earth overspread. NO OTHER SONS

20And Noah began to be an husbandman, and he planted a vineyard: HERE IS WHERE THE TROUBLE STARTS,

21And he drank of the wine, and was drunken; and he was uncovered within his tent. NOAH DID NOT HAVE ANY COVERING ON HIM BLANKETS OR ANIMAL HIDES OR ANYTHING AS ANYONE WHO PASSES OUT, HAS NO AWARENESS OR SENSE OF PRECAUTION ,,,

22And Ham, the father of Canaan, saw the nakedness of his father, and told his two brethren without. SO CLEARLY STATED THAT NOT EVEN A CHILD DOES NOT KNOW WHAT THE WORD [SAW] AND [TOLD] MEANS IT MEANS HE SEEN,[ NO ACT OF PERVERSION IS IMPLIED OR STATED. HE SAW WITH HIS EYES, AND HE TOLD OTHERS, THATS IT, HE DID NOT UNCOVER HIS FATHER, HE DID NOT ATTACK HIS FATHER, HE DID NOT TAKE ADVANTAGE OF THE SITUATION….HE SIMPLY SAW SOMETHING EMBARRISNG TOLD HIS BROTHERS ABOUT WHAT HE HAD SAW … HE WAS ALREADY UNCOVERED DUHHHHH! OPERATIVE WORDS MY FRIEND IS SAW & TOLD THEY ARE THE ACTION WORDS SIMPLE ENGLISH

23And Shem and Japheth took a garment, and laid it upon both their shoulders, and went backward, and covered the nakedness of their father; and their faces were backward, and they saw not their father’s nakedness. HAM CANT GO GET A COVERING ITS TOO LATE FOR HIM THATS WHY HE DONT GET THE BLANKET OR WHATEVER . NOW THESE 2 BOYS KNOWING FIRSTHAND FROM THEIR BROTHER HAM, THAT NOAH LAY NAKED IN THE TENT, WISHED NOT TO REPEAT WHAT THE OTHER SON FOOLISHLY DID BY ACCIDENT, THEY SIMPLY TOOK A GARMENT, WALKED BACKWARDS, SAW NOT [THERE GOES THAT OPERATIVE WORD] THEIR FATHERS NAKENESS AND COVERED THEIR FATHERS NAKEDNES, WITH A GARMENT …… IT IS THAT SIMPLE!

24And Noah awoke from his wine, and knew what his younger son had done unto him. HERE IS WHERE THE ENTIRE FALSE NARRATIVE OF SEXUAL ABUSE DERIVES FROM, THE PHRASE, [DONE UNTO HIM] WHAT WAS DONE WAS NOT AN ACT OF SEXUAL ABUSE OR INCEST, BUT THE VERY SIMPLE FACT THAT HIS SON SAW I SAID SAW, SAW, SAW THAT WAS THE ACT, ANYONE WOULD BE IMMEDIALTLEY UPSET BY SOMEONE SEENG YOU NAKED, THE ULTIMATE SHAME OF IT AND TELLING OTHERS ABOUT WHAT HE SAW. THAT MY FRIEND IS CLEAR ENGLISH LANGUAGE, YOU MAY WANT TO READ MORE INTO IT IF YOU LIKE, BUT THE HOLY SPIRIT DIDNT PUT ANY MORE ENPHAISIS ON THAN SIMPLE ENBARRESMENT FROM BEING FOUND NAKED. AND FOR DISOBEYING THE LAWS IN LEVITCUS 18 AS WE SHALL SOON SEE .

YES HAM DISOBEYED THE LAWS GIVEN TO MOSES, ON DISCOVERING ONES NAKEDNESS

25And he said, Cursed be Canaan; a servant of servants shall he be unto his brethren. IN CASE YOU DIDNT NOTICE, NOAH DOES NOT CURSE HAM WHO SAW HIS NAKEDNESS BUT CURSED HIS GRANDSON. ALSO IF YOU DIDNT NOTICE IT, GOD DID NOT PUT A CURSE ON HAM, AS SO FALSELLY TAUGHT, BUT PERMITTED NOAHS CURSE ON CANNAN TO GO INTO EFFECT AND RIGHLTY SO

26And he said, Blessed be the LORD God of Shem; and Canaan shall be his servant. SHEM GETS A BLESSING ..HAM DOES NOT

27God shall enlarge Japheth, and he shall dwell in the tents of Shem; and Canaan shall be his servant. JAPHETH GETS A BLESSING HAM DOES NOT

CANNAN HAMS SON GETS THE GENERATIONAL CURSE HAM DOES NOT

28And Noah lived after the flood three hundred and fifty years, HAM IS LEFT OUT THATS IT NO MENTION OF HAM HOW ABOUT THAT ONE !!

29And all the days of Noah were nine hundred and fifty years: and he died. END OF STORY

IN CLOSING THIS STUDY, PAY CLOSE ATTENTION TO WHAT GOD HAS TO SAY ABOUT ANYONES NAKEDNESS, YES GOD CLEARLY SAID THAT IT IS WICKEDNESS, AND IN LEVITCUS 18, MADE IT A BIG DEAL AND TOLD MOSES AND HIS PEOPLE, HOW SERIOUS THIS ACT [VIOLATION] ACTUALLY IS

THERE ARE CERTAIN PARTICULR MENTIONS OF NAKEDNESS IN OTHER SCRIPTURES AND IS ASSOCICATED WITH THE ACT OF FORNICATION….. HOWEVER!! THIS ISNT ONE OF THEM FOR SURE

18 And the Lord spake unto Moses, saying,

² Speak unto the children of Israel, and say unto them, I am the Lord your God.

³ After the doings of the land of Egypt, wherein ye dwelt, shall ye not do: and after the doings of the land of Canaan, whither I bring you, shall ye not do: neither shall ye walk in their ordinances.

⁴ Ye shall do my judgments, and keep mine ordinances, to walk therein: I am the Lord your God.

⁵ Ye shall therefore keep my statutes, and my judgments: which if a man do, he shall live in them: I am the Lord.

⁶ None of you shall approach to any that is near of kin to him, to uncover their nakedness: I am the Lord.

⁷ The nakedness of thy father, or the nakedness of thy mother, shalt thou not uncover: she is thy mother; thou shalt not uncover her nakedness.

PAY PARTICULAR ATTENTION TO THE WORD UNCOVER CLEARLY MEANS TO DISCOVER HER NAKEDNESS IT CLEARLY DOES NOT IMPLY THAT HAM REMOVED CLOTHING OR GARMETS HAM NEVER UNCOVERED NOAH THE TEXT CLEARLY STATES THAT , NOAH WAS ALREADY UNCOVERED IN THE TENT ALL HAM IS GUITY OF IS SEEING [SAW ] HE SAW THE NAKEDNESS , THATS IT… THAT BROUGHT ON THE CURSE TO HAMS SON CANAAN.. AS RECORDED THROUGHTOUT SCRIPTURE.

⁸ The nakedness of thy father’s wife shalt thou not uncover: it is thy father’s nakedness.

⁹ The nakedness of thy sister, the daughter of thy father, or daughter of thy mother, whether she be born at home, or born abroad, even their nakedness thou shalt not uncover.

¹⁰ The nakedness of thy son’s daughter, or of thy daughter’s daughter, even their nakedness thou shalt not uncover: for theirs is thine own nakedness.

¹¹ The nakedness of thy father’s wife’s daughter, begotten of thy father, she is thy sister, thou shalt not uncover her nakedness.

¹² Thou shalt not uncover the nakedness of thy father’s sister: she is thy father’s near kinswoman.

¹³ Thou shalt not uncover the nakedness of thy mother’s sister: for she is thy mother’s near kinswoman.

¹⁴ Thou shalt not uncover the nakedness of thy father’s brother, thou shalt not approach to his wife: she is thine aunt.

¹⁵ Thou shalt not uncover the nakedness of thy daughter in law: she is thy son’s wife; thou shalt not uncover her nakedness.

¹⁶ Thou shalt not uncover the nakedness of thy brother’s wife: it is thy brother’s nakedness.

¹⁷ Thou shalt not uncover the nakedness of a woman and her daughter, neither shalt thou take her son’s daughter, or her daughter’s daughter, to uncover her nakedness; for they are her near kinswomen: it is wickedness.

¹⁸ Neither shalt thou take a wife to her sister, to vex her, to uncover her nakedness, beside the other in her life time.

¹⁹ Also thou shalt not approach unto a woman to uncover her nakedness, as long as she is put apart for her uncleanness.

²⁰ Moreover thou shalt not lie carnally with thy neighbour’s wife, to defile thyself with her.

²¹ And thou shalt not let any of thy seed pass through the fire to Molech, neither shalt thou profane the name of thy God: I am the Lord.

²² Thou shalt not lie with mankind, as with womankind: it is abomination.

²³ Neither shalt thou lie with any beast to defile thyself therewith: neither shall any woman stand before a beast to lie down thereto: it is confusion.

²⁴ Defile not ye yourselves in any of these things: for in all these the nations are defiled which I cast out before you:

²⁵ And the land is defiled: therefore I do visit the iniquity thereof upon it, and the land itself vomiteth out her inhabitants.

²⁶ Ye shall therefore keep my statutes and my judgments, and shall not commit any of these abominations; neither any of your own nation, nor any stranger that sojourneth among you:

²⁷ (For all these abominations have the men of the land done, which were before you, and the land is defiled;)

²⁸ That the land spue not you out also, when ye defile it, as it spued out the nations that were before you.

²⁹ For whosoever shall commit any of these abominations, even the souls that commit them shall be cut off from among their people.

³⁰ Therefore shall ye keep mine ordinance, that ye commit not any one of these abominable customs, which were committed before you, and that ye defile not yourselves therein: I am the Lord your God

YES HAM VIOLATED THIS COMMANDMENT GOD GAVE THE CHILDREN OF ISRAEL IN LEV;18, NOAH AND HIS SONS WERE WELL AWARE OF THAT SCRIPTURE SO MUCH THAT NOAH PRONOUNCED A CURSE ON HAMS SON HIS GREANDSON , CANAAN, THATS THE HOLY SPIRITS VERSION OF THE MATTER AND FOR ME THE HOLY SPIRIT HAS THE FINAL SAY, READ INTO IT AS ONE WILL, BUT YOU WILL DO YOURSELF GREAT HARM, AND A DISHONOR TO THE WORDS PENNED BY THE HOLY SPIRIT OF GOD.

WHAT HAM HAD ACTUALLY DONE …….. MADE NOAH SO OUTRAGED, WAS HAMS VIOLATION OR DISREGAURD TO GODS COMMANDMENT REGARDING NAKEDNESS YES SEEING HIS FATHERS NAKEDNESS HAD ALREADY PUT HIM UNDER A CONDEMNATION, HE HAD BROKEN THAT LAW IN LEVITCUS 18 YES GOD SPENT AN ENTIRE CHAPTER ON NAKEDNESS, IT WAS CONSIDERED WICKEDNESS AND ABOMINATION AS WELL, AND NOAH KNEW IT, NOAHS SON COMMITTED THAT WICKEDNESS, AND HAS DEFILED HIMSELF AND WAS TO BE CUTOFF FROM AMONG THE PEOPLE, DEFILED THE LAND AND WAS TO BE CAST OUT SO GOD CLARIFIED THIS EVENT

THEY WERE JUDGEMENTS AND STATUTES, AND COMMANDMENTS YET HAM BROKE EVERYONE OF THEM

NOW WHY DIDNT NOAH CURSE HAM THE VERY ONE WHO VIOLATED THE LAW, WELL TO ME ITS OBVIOUS, NOAHS SON VIOLATED THIS COOMANDMENT AND SO .. AND ONLY PROPER THAT THE SON OF HAM NOW INHERIITS THE CURSE OF HIS FATHER HAM, NOAHS SON HAM SINS NOW PASSES ON TO HIS SON CANAAN.. IT IS REALLY THAT SIMPLE!!

A GENERATIONAL CURSE IF YOU WILL … HAPPENS ALL THROUGH THE WORD OF GOD WHERE DECENDANTS GET TO PAY THE PENALTY FOR THIER FORFATHERS ACTS OF DISOBEDIENCE

GENESIS 9 STATES PRIOR TO THIS EVENT THAT HAM HAD A SON CANAAN SETTING UP THE FOLLOWING TEXTS AS TO WHY CANAAN IS MENTIONED IN A CURSE.

IT CAN BE ARGUED THAT NOAHS SON HAM BROUGHT GREAT SHAME ON NOAH HIS FATHER BY DISOBEYING GODS COMMANDS BRINGING JUDGEMENT AND THUS AS A RESULT, HAM WILL NOW FACE SIMILAR CIRCUMSTANCES BY KNOWING HIS SON WILL BE CURSED. FOR THAT DISOBEDIENCE . .IT REALLY IS THAT SIMPLE …. NO SEX IS IMPLIED BY THE TEXT OR COMITTED HOWEVER ,,,,ALL THE SCRIPTURAL EVIDENCE CLEARLY STATES OTHEWISE

THATS THE BIG DEAL THATS THE TRUTH SAM MARTINO