Here is an old wise Bible teaching to remember when approaching any and all Bible teachings and or verifying a particular doctrine is in fact Biblical
WHEN THE PLAIN SENSE OF SCRIPTURES MAKE SENSE, SEEK NO OTHER SENSE
MY PERSONAL STUDY, INTO THIS MATTER, HAS REVEALED MUCH MORE THAN MEETS THE EYE, ON 2 INSERTED PAGES, DIVIDING THE BIBLE, INTO 2 MAIN DIVISIONS
DIVISIONS THAT THE WORD OF GOD, HAS NOT EVER TAUGHT, SO WHO ARE THEY THAT DECIDED THAT OUR BIBLES GET DIVIDED THIS WAY.
YOU MAY THINK THIS IS NOT A BIG DEAL, BUT EVERY TIME YOUR PASTOR OR SOMEONE SAYS TO YOU...LETS NOW TURN THE THE NEW TESTAMENT , YOU MAY WANT TO ASK HIM WHY 27 BOOKS ARE DIVIDED THAT WAY , WHY 27 BOOKS, ARE TAUGHT TO TEACH THE NEW TESTAMENT IS FOUND IN THEM , YOU MAY WANT TO ASK HIM, THE SAME QUESTION FOR THE OLD TESTAMENT... TO REFER TO THE COLLECTION OF SCRIPTURES JUST BECAUSE THERE WAS A 400 GAP AFTER MALACHI TO MATTHEW, AND JESUS SHOWS UP IN MATTHEW, IS NO BIBLICAL REASON, TO TEACH OR MAKE ANYONE THINK, IT ... THE 27 BOOKS ... CONTAINS ANYTHING NEW
DIFFERENT YES BUT NOTHING NEW, AS CHRIST WAS PROPHESISED OVER 300 TIMES FROM GEN 1 ... TILL MALACHI
ALSO HEBREW SCRIPTURES [49 BOOKS] AND GREEK[ 27 BOOKS] CLEARLY DOES NOT MEAN 2 DIFFERENT COVENANTS
NO WHERE IN THE ENTIRE BIBLE DOES ONE EVER FIND THE MENTION OF COVENANT AND IT MEANT OR MEANS A COLLECTION OR GROUP OF WRITINGS BOOKS OR EPISTLES
NO NOT ONE TIME EVER, DID YOU GET THAT , NEVER EVER IS IT MEANT TO BE A COLLECTION OF VERSES, CHAPTERS, OR BOOKS WRITTEN BY ANYONE ANYWHERE,
SO WHERE AND HOW DID IT BECOME WHAT IT IS TODAY QUOTED BY ALMOST EVERY BIBLICAL SCHOLAR, READER, AND TEACHER EVERYWERE, INCLUDING THIS AUTHOR BY TRADITION AND HABIT. BUT ONCE I GOT THE BIBLE DIVIDED THE BIBLE WAY , THIS CONFUSION WENT COMPLETELY AWAY.
AFTER READING THESE FACTS [NOT TRADITIONALY TAUGHT] YOU WILL SEE THAT OUR WRONGLY DIVIDED BIBLE NEVER MEANT TO BE DIVIDED BY GOD INTO THE 2 SO CALLED TESTAMENTS .... YOUR COMMENTS OR CORRECTIONS TO THIS SUBJECT WILL BE WELCOMED WITH OPEN HEART AND ARMS .GOD INSTEAD THRU HIS HOLY SPIRIT, HAS CLEARLY EXPLAINED AND DEFINED EACH MENTION OF THE NT EVERY SINGLE TIME OF THE WORD COVENANT AND HE NEVER EVER ONCE DEFINED IT AS TRADITIONALY TAUGHT.
A Biblical perspective on Bible topics and subjects from a position of Rightly Dividing the Word of Truth,
King James Bible - God's Word in the English Speaking language.
SANCTIFY THEM THROUGH THY TRUTH
THY WORD IS TRUTH [ JOHN, 17:17 KJB ]
THY WORD IS TRUE FROM THE BEGINNING [PSALMS 119,:160
THE TRUTH IS THE TRUTH EVEN IF NO ONE BELIEVES IT
AND A LIE IS A LIE EVEN IF ANYONE DOESN'T BELIEVE IT
THE TRUTH IS THE TRUTH EVEN IF NO ONE ACCEPTS IT
THE TRUTH IS THE TRUTH EVEN IF NO ONE UNDERSTANDS IT
THE TRUTH IS THE TRUTH EVEN IF YOU HIDE IT
BELIEVING EVERYBODY IS DANGEROUS
BUT BELIEVING NOBODY IS MORE DANGEROUS
-Forget the traditional way our Bibles have been divided, by these 2 inserted papers called the Old & New Testaments, the Word of God states otherwise.
One thing for sure is people are more inclined to follow family and Church tradition, than have the Word of God clarify what is and what is not.
No where in the Bible are we ever told or is it ever hinted to or stated, that the NT contains 27 books and the OT contains 49 books.
THE BIBLE IS CLEAR THAT ALL [SCRIPTURE] IN INSPIRED , SCRIPTURES ARE HIS PRESERVED WORDS, IT NEVER REFERS TO THE ORIGINALL GREEK OR HEBREW AT ALL.
WE HEAR ALL OUR LIVES, FROM PASTORS TV EVANGILSIT AND SORT, USE THIS PHRASE, AS IF THE BIBLE TEACHES IT ...I GOT NEWS FOR YOU IT DOES NOT.
FIND ME ANY VERSES IN CONTEXT TO THE TERM, YOU WILL FIND NONE, IT DOES NOT EXIST.
GENESIS 1:1 TO EXODOS 19; THERE IS NOT ONE WORD OF THE SO CALLED OT IN THOSE CHAPTERS TILL MOSES GOT CALLED UP TO MT SINAI TO RECEIVE THE COMMANDMENTS AND THATS WHEN THE NATION OF JEWISH PEOPLE WERE ACTUALLY FIRST FORMED AND GATHERED .... TO CALL OR QUOTE OR REFER TO THOSE CHAPTERS IS TO WRONGLY DIVIDE THE WORD OF TRUTH . IT WAS THE ROMAN CHURCH IN THE 4TH CENTURY THAT PLACED THE 27 JEWISH EPISTLES MATTHEW- REVELATION , AND NAMED THEM OLD & NEW TESTAMENT BOOKS. SAME IS TRUE WITH THE NT EPISTLES. JUST BECAUSE A 400 YEAR GAP OCCURED AND THESE 27 JEWISH EPISTLES A CONTINUATION ...WERE TRANSLATED FROM HEBREW TO GREEK , DOES NOT FOR ONE SECOND MEAN THEY ARE NEW .. THEY WERE ALL JEWISH EPISTLES EVERY SINGLE BOOK IN THE BIBLE IS WRITTEN BY A JEW OR A DECENDANT OF ONE .
THE FOLLOWING VERSES ARE WHAT THE HOLY SPIRIT HAS TERMED THEY ARE NOT CHURCH FATHERS AND TRADITION , SO LET THE BIBLE DEFINE THE TERM . SOME VERSES MAY REFER TO IT IN SPIRIT BUT NOT IN WORD, WHEN IN WORD AS BELOW IT MEANS WHAT IT MEANS ONLY FOR THE NATION OF ISRAEL, AND ONLY FOR AND TO THAT NATION, DURING THE 1000 YEAR MILLENAL REIGN OF CHRIST.
ALL 66 BOOKS OF OUR BIBLE ARE ALL JEWISH OF COURSE THERE ARE DISPENSATIONAL DOCTRINES FOR JEW, GENTILE AND THE CHURCH OF GOD OF COURSE WE WILL FIND THINGS WRITTEN TO DIFFERENT GROUPS TO & IN DIFFERENT TIME PERIODS AS GOD HAS DEALT WITH MANKIND FROM ADAM - REVELATION. BUT AND I REPEAT THE BUT..THAT DOES NOT MEAN THAT THERE WAS EVER TO BE 2 DISTINCT DIVISIONS IN HIS WORD. THE BIBLE IS PREDOMINATLEY JEWISH. THE SCRIPTURES OF MATTHEW - REVELATION ARE NOTHING BUT A CONTINUATION OF THOSE PREVIOUS OLD JEWISH EPISTLES. SO TO DIVIDE OUR BIBLE INTO 2 IS TO WRONGLY DIVIDE THE WORD OF TRUTH, AND IN DOIONG SO, WILL LEAD TO GREAT DOCTRINAL ERRORS. ERROR SUCH AS THE GREAT COMMISION OF MATTHEW 15 AND MARK TO GO YE INTO THE WORLD TO PREACH THE GOSPEL .THE JEWISH KINGDOM GOSPEL AND NOT THE CHRISTIAN GOSPEL OF GRACE AND CHRIST CRUCIFIED. THATS JUST ONE EXAMPLE OF WRONGLY DIVIDING THE WORD OF TRUTH .
Bible verses related to New Covenant[OR NEW PROMISE] NOT REFERRING TO 27 NT BOOKS BUT FROM ALL THE JEWISH EPISTLES in the King James Version (KJV) by Book Order. THE NEW TESTAMENT OR COVENANT, IS STRICTLY FOR THE JEW-JEW-JEW AND THE NATION OF ISRAEL DURING THE 1000 YEAR MILLENIAL REIGN OF CHRIST.
TO SAY OTHERWISE, IS TO PERVERT THE CLEAR BIBLICAL PROMISE MADE TO SOULY THE SAVED JEWS DURING THE TRIBULATION PERIOD. READ YOUR BIBLE TOS SEE THAT THIS IS SO .
Bible verses related to New Covenant from the King James Version (KJV) by Book Order
Jeremiah 31:31-34 - Behold, the days come, saith the LORD, that I will make a new covenant with the house of Israel, and with the house of Judah: (Read More...)
Jeremiah 31:31 - Behold, the days come, saith the LORD, that I will make a new covenant with the house of Israel, and with the house of Judah:
Jeremiah 31:33 - But this shall be the covenant that I will make with the house of Israel; After those days, saith the LORD, I will put my law in their inward parts, and write it in their hearts; and will be their God, and they shall be my people.
Mark 14:24 - And he said unto them, This is my blood of the new testament, which is shed for many.
Luke 22:20 - Likewise also the cup after supper, saying, This cup is the new testament in my blood, which is shed for you.
Romans 6:14 - For sin shall not have dominion over you: for ye are not under the law, but under grace.
Romans 7:6 - But now we are delivered from the law, that being dead wherein we were held; that we should serve in newness of spirit, and not in the oldness of the letter.
Romans 8:1-4 - There is therefore now no condemnation to them which are in Christ Jesus, who walk not after the flesh, but after the Spirit. (Read More...)
Romans 8:1-39 - There is therefore now no condemnation to them which are in Christ Jesus, who walk not after the flesh, but after the Spirit. (Read More...)
Romans 11:27 - For this is my covenant unto them, when I shall take away their sins.
1 Corinthians 11:25 - After the same manner also he took the cup, when he had supped, saying, This cup is the new testament in my blood: this do ye, as oft as ye drink it, in remembrance of me.
2 Corinthians 3:6 - Who also hath made us able ministers of the new testament; not of the letter, but of the spirit: for the letter killeth, but the spirit giveth life.
Hebrews 1:1-14 - God, who at sundry times and in divers manners spake in time past unto the fathers by the prophets, (Read More...)
Hebrews 8:6 - But now hath he obtained a more excellent ministry, by how much also he is the mediator of a better covenant, which was established upon better promises.
Hebrews 8:7-8 - For if that first covenant had been faultless, then should no place have been sought for the second. (Read More...)
Hebrews 8:13 - In that he saith, A new covenant, he hath made the first old. Now that which decayeth and waxeth old is ready to vanish away.
Hebrews 9:11-15 - But Christ being come an high priest of good things to come, by a greater and more perfect tabernacle, not made with hands, that is to say, not of this building; (Read More...)
Hebrews 9:15 - And for this cause he is the mediator of the new testament, that by means of death, for the redemption of the transgressions that were under the first testament, they which are called might receive the promise of eternal inheritance.
First - it must be approached through a dispensational manner .
Second- it must not conflict with Clear Biblical teachings in other books of the Bible.
Third- it must be in context with other scriptures, to form a uniform concept to all Bible doctrines.
Fourth- it must agree with the Holy spirit filled men who wrote as they [ not us ] were moved [directed] by the Holy spirit . it is they.... not us , who determine the way to divide ....not Bible Scholars , Professors, Pastors or Televangelists.
Fifth- it cannot be derived from any other sources other than God through his scriptures which warns us to abstain from made pagan religions, societies and movements such as the many false Churches and Ministries ... in this case The Roman Catholic Church who decided what books would be the New Testament ....... and what books would be the Old Testament a system of demonic teachings and doctrines of Devils. God would never in all his infinite wisdom, would never use Popes and Bishops and false teachers to provide Biblical insights regarding this particular topic Old and New testaments, so Rome was responsible for the incorrect division of the Bible.
Now let us consider each one in their Biblical perspectives as God has implemented in his Word .
We will now explore the traditional teachings of the bible being traditionally divided as the Old & New Testaments.
I say [ traditionally] as that is exactly how and why we have divided mostly all bibles , including the King James Bible , have been wrongly divided this way.
One very important fact to understand, is that the Publishers and not God, caused this error by inserting these 2 pages and have caused divisional error. The other fact to consider, is the fact that the Roman Catholic Church, orchestrated, this division, in an attempt to further divide, the believing church. History bares that out , St Jerome, [under the orders of Rome in the late 3rd century] through the authority of Pope Damous . who personally decided that 27 books [Matthew- Revelation] would constitute the so called New Testament scriptures.
Thus our current Bibles all have the 2 inserted pages [Old & New] placed as a divisional divide. This division, is [unknown ] in Holy Writ, and is a strange concept or teaching, conflicting with actual Bible doctrines. uninformed and void of properly [Rightly] dividing the scriptures as we are instructed to do. Almost every Pastor and televangelist and all bible teachers and bible seminaries and colleges including every YouTube internet wannna be Bible teachers often say to their followers.... let us now turn to or please turn to a particular book, in the New Testament , and so one immediately turns to the divisional page [New Testament of our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ] as titled' without ever questioning as to why. The result of that wrong division is that we [including this author] was ignorantly and incorrectly taught that the New Testament books contain Christian instructions and teachings. Of course we know that Jewish doctrines are included and Gentiles as well, in these 27 books, BUT IT does not diminish from the fact that , the writers under the holy spirit direction, did not divide their writings that way. For the first 3 centuries of church history, the 2 inserted pages,[not inspired ] or believed, were ever thought to be a method of division . Paul in Galatians states quote[ Give heed to neither the Jews nor to the Gentiles, nor to the church of God .
Clearly a 3 dispensational teaching. The fact that God has dealt with these 3 dispensational bodies [from Genesis through Revelation] is clear and decisive evidence of the only correct way of understanding , the 3 groups of people.
Another clear and obvious fact not even considered by most if not all ministries and televangelist, including all so called Christian churches , of which all follow this wrongly Roman Catholic Method of Bible division .
Now the question begs to be answered; Did God wait hundreds of years for this false teaching orchestrated by the Roman Popes , to divide his scriptures??... Cleary he did not, and so how does one Rightly Divide the Bible [ The King James Bible], ;;; We simply follow the scriptures and Pauls method of Rightly dividing the Word of Truth . Here are just a few
1- Hebrews Chapter 1 reads; God who at Sundry times [ various ways ] , and in divers manners [ different manners ] spake [ inspired the believers and prophets ] in times past unto the fathers by the prophets hath in these last days spoken to us [the apostles ] by his Son whom he hath appointed heir of all things , by whom also he made the world .
Clearly Paul followed the dispensational way of preaching and reaching the then known world , as God had directed him. So to clarify further, God did use Paul .. in a dispensational manner, to different groups in different locations and at different times.... do not fall for those who will label Paul or yourself as a Hyper - dispensationalist .... as if Paul carried his God given spirit of truth .. by going too far ... nothing can be further from the truth . We are to rightly divide the Word of Truth as Paul has done.
2- 1ST COR 10:32 Reads, Give none offence, neither to the Jews, nor to the Gentiles, nor to the Church [Mystery Church] of God ...
Again a very clear distinct statement by the Apostle Paul, who obviously believed in [3 very different and distinct bodies of people ] Rightly dividing the scriptures, is the only true method to be applied when studying the Bible.
3- 1st TIM 2:15 Reads Study to show thyself approved unto God, a workman that needeth not to be ashamed, rightly dividing the word of truth .. that is in context and in a dispensational manner as Paul as so clearly done.
Now that we have set forth a Biblical perspective as to how and why to divide the scriptures when reading and studying, or for that matter ... testing all other teachings, we can with great confidence, conclude the Bible [King James Bible ] Gods word for the English speaking population , will be our foundation of truth going forward with this very important study.
THE OLD TESTAMENT
The Old Testament Books as we shall see & so incorrectly labeled by the publishers by inserted 2 pages...have wrongly been dividing the word of God and will be proven to have done so as follows .
- There are 66 books in our English Bibles, starting with the book of Genesis correct?
- The Title page inserted ..Old Testament .. is placed by man before the book of Genesis in almost all Bibles correct ?
By Inserting that page before Genesis Chapter 1 vs 1 ... one is led to conclude that from Genesis 1 to the last book of the Bible... Malachi or 49 books .. all scriptures contain the Old Covenant promises , given By God to the the Jews and National Israel ...
That is just simply impossible ..Scripturally, Mathematically , and in a Dispensational manner, as it conflicts with the Apostle Pauls ministry ,,, but most of all .. contradicts Gods very own words commands and Bible precepts as follows
- First the world of Adam was strictly Gentile , up until the time of the flood and continuing after the flood, ... There was not a Jew on the earth, nor was there a Nation called Israel, nor did the Book of Genesis ever record the Old Testament [Covenant] Promised to Moses only] .. ever written down or implied in the entire book of Genesis
- Why this is so , is clearly due to a very simply fact,,, and often overlooked... since the inserted Old Testament page has confused and misdirected everyone to believe otherwise ... Moses did not receive the Covenant .. known as the Old Testament or Old Promise ] until he summoned to atop Mount Sanai .. hundreds of years later at Exodus Chapter 19.. it was then and there that God created the Jewish nation of some 600,000 Gentiles and then and there [at that moment in time] CREATED a people unto himself .
- Moses received the covenant at that point in time and the 600,000 Gentiles became the 600,000 of the Jewish nation.
Fact # 1
A fact that cannot be disputed as it is written down in Holy Writ in a chronological order .. in a dispensational manner .
- That this is so, can be further proven as the book of Exodus, contains this event as a one time creation of the Jewish Nation. Hundreds of years after Adam.
- It is Biblically incorrect therefore , to lead one to believe that the Book of Genesis contains .. or for that matter.. is the first book of the Old Testament! it is not .
- The Book of Genesis cannot be labeled Old Testament it does not contain the Promise given only in EX 19. again hundreds of years later.
- To Wrongly divide this doctrinal principal violates Gods word and contradicts Pauls teachings , to Rightly Divide the word of truth, Paul had the manuscripts of the prophets of old before him , he told demonstrated to approach the scriptures by dispensations , Jews Gentiles, and the Church[ Mystery Church ] of God 3 distinct bodies and 3 distinct time periods in which God dealt with all three in different manners at different times ,,, read 1st Chapter Hebrews to see if this is so
- By Wrongly dividing this way, we will be an ashamed workman according to 2 TIM 2:15
- By accepting the Roman Catholic division, we are ignoring Gods clear instructions using his way to divide .
- By accepting a traditional perspective from a Publisher , we are entering into Apostacy
Fact #2
There is not [one word of the Old Testament ] from GEN 1 :1 until EX 19 and therefore we should avoid this on the basis that it is not Biblically or Doctrinally correct, and only confuses one to believe false teachings . The importance of rightly dividing the Bibles doctrines are of Monumental Importance according to God , who did not use the Roman church or for that matter .. the publishers to decide where his words or doctrines get divided, but by his apostles and prophet. To refer to any verse in Geneses 1:1 up till Exodus 19:1-8, is to wrongly divide the Word of Truth, as the Old Covenant, was not even given to Moses until 2600 years later after Adam & Eve.... So tell me how all these Pastors and so called teachers, Bible scholars and alike, do not knwo this ... it is an historical fact... not my opinion. 49 Books separated by a period of 400 years till Matthew writes his Epistle, is not a reason to call the 27 Jewish Epistles New as there is nothing New in them, simply a continuation of the Jewish Epistles from the first 49 Books..... The Publishers have inserted these OLD & NEW Testament pages, if you have a Bible KJB simply rightly divide the Word of truth as instructed and the confusion goes completely away. God nowhere at anytime anywhere in all his Word, ever states or implies that his Word is divided into these Two divisions, if you find it please let me know, It cannot be done.s.
New Testament
Now that we have clearly seen that there is not one word of the Old Covenant from Geneses 1 to Exodus 19:1-8
Now let us turn our attention to the so called New Testament .... everyone who instructs the reader to, by telling one to turn in their Bibles to any book in the so called New Testament ,, is not dividing the word of truth as the Bible instructs .They often say that the Old Testament is for the Jew and the New Testament if for the Christian.. nothing could be further from the truth .
The 27 books [Matthew - Revelation] often referred to as the New Testament ,, often separated by 4 gospels , Pauline Epistles and so forth are nothing more than a continuation of previous Jewish epistles!
And a clear precise method of Rightly Dividing the Word of Truth, proves to be otherwise .
JUST BECAUSE THE HEBREW AND ARAMAIC SCRIPTURES WERE TRANSLATED TO GREEK, THE EPISTLES FROM MATTHEW - REVELATION ...TO GREEK DOES NOT NOR WILL EVER MEAN THEY ARE NEW
NO MY FRIEND MATTHEW - REVELATION ARE A CONTINUATION OF THE PREVIOUS 49 BOOKS, INTERRUPTED BY A 400 GAP AFTE3R MALACHI.. THATS BIBLE THATS THE TRUTH. NO GREEK TRANSLATION EVER MEANS NEW AS THE NEW COVENANT AS WE SHALL SEE , TEH NEW COVENANT IS TO BE FOR THE JEWISH NATION IN THE MILLENIAL REIGN OF CHRIST ACCORDING TO THE SCRIPTURES... NOT ACCORDING TO SCHOLARS AND SO CALLED CHURCH FATHERS.... NO SCHOLAR NOR SO CALLED BABIES WILL EVER DECIDE WHAT HAS ALREADY BEEN PENNED IN THE HOLY SCRIPTURES..NEVER!.
Facts to remember
Most times it becomes necessary, to ask questions to get to the truth and Facts to support ones position.
In doing it in this manner, the questions in and of themselves, beg to be answered in a dispensational manner and in context to all other scriptures.
- Either God is in control of all or he is not
- Either God knows best or he does not
- Either God would have revealed the separate scriptures to the Gentiles , Jews and Church of God or he did not
- Either God waited for Rome or he did not
- Either God decided history and tradition would be best and not himself or he did not
- Either God means what he say and says what he means or he did not and had to wait 400 years for Rome
- Either God chose to not reveal these truths of Old & New covenants to his Spirit filled prophets or he did
Either way, the only conclusion one can arrive at is any additional writers, who would attempt to wrongly divide his word hundreds of years later, and from all walks of life , from all different denominations and divisions ,could not possibly have been chosen divinely to cause such massive and destructive consequences, thus confusing all believers, as to what is and what is not Old and New Testament doctrines .
Clearly God is not the author of confusion Satan is . now that is interesting , in and of itself? isn't it
- There is not one word of the New Testament in these 27 books ... in Spirit yes in some books but in Word .. absolutely not and here is why
- The books were [ better termed Epistles [all Jewish] were translated form Greek Manuscripts [ that does not make them New anything .
- The books were put in this order by none other than Rome in the 4th century, under St Jerome [ A Roman Catholic ]
- Further proof that these books do not contain New Testament doctrine is clear by defining what and to which body of people it was directed to
- Just because their was a 400 year gap of silence between the last Old Testament book Malachi and Matthew .. doesn't mean its new prophecy
- Just because it was translated from Greek and not the Hebrew and Aramaic languages doesn't mean its new revelation
- Just because the publishers inserted the pages New & Old doesn't make them New revelations
- Just because tradition places these books in this order .. doesn't make them New Revelation
- Just because the Pagan church of Rome , actually directed the order of the 27 books doesn't make them New Revelations
- Just because church history followed Rome's wrongly divided method really does not make them New Revelation
- Just because Pastors and Evangelists and TV ministries followed the errors of history and tradition doesn't make them New Revelation
Now ask yourselves these questions
- Did God wait 400 years to divide his words[Epistles]
- Would God use the Roman Catholic false teachings to do so
- Did God wait for Rome to decide what is and what is not New
- How can a Holy God break his very own commands and use such a wicked and Idolatrous Religion to divide his Word
- God knew he would have an Old and New covenant why did he not use the Holy prophets and writers he called
- Gods Covenants were only to the Nation of Israel and the Jewish race ,,, no covenants were to any gentiles
- Who are these men in history who have taken it on their own to deicide what is Old and New...???
- By what and who's authority did they get their directives
- Who determined that that the Greek translation of the Epistles of Matthew to Revelation are to be New Covenant doctrines Who
- Why would God not reveal how to divide his 2 Covenants when he first gave the spirit of Truth to & through the prophets and writers
- Why if not most or all Bible teachers and readers , ignorantly think and believe, just because they were Greek translations they are to be deemed New
- How did God know how to distinguish these 2 covenants without those inserted OT & NT pages they were simply not there for the first 300plus years
Now for the so called New Testament and order of books
What is the New Testament , is our question we will refer to it as NT for abbreviation
- It is not a collection of 27 books Matthew - Revelation
- No where in the 27 so called NT books is the NT ever referred to as a collection of books
- It is never mentioned in a doctrinal way, in word but only in a few Epistles is it mentioned in Spirit
- NT was never intended for the Christian
- St Jerome a Roman Catholic was ordered by his Pope to separate Epistles into a collection called NT
- Why would Rome be used by God 400 years after all the Gospel writers died he could have written the NT in his word but he did not
- Obtaining Church doctrine from them is wrongly dividing the word of truth 2 TIM 2:15
Now for some Biblical facts as to why these Epistles [ the words of God] are not to be thought of as NT doctrine or books.
- No where in Holy writ are the books [Epistles of Matthew - Revelation ever referred to as NT books
- No where in these books is it ever referred to be for NT Christians
- The Passover was Jewish not Christian read EXODUS 12:43,44 1 COR, 5 :7,8
- The NT will be used to govern the Jews not the Christians JER 31:31 IN THE MILLENIAL REIGN OF CHRIST
- The NT was placed in full at Calvary
- Not placed in Force till his return to the Jews MT 19:27-30 , EZ 34: 23-31 JER 31:31
- The Great Commission of MAT 28:19;20 MK 16, :15-18 IS JEWSIH AND WAS NOT TO BE BROUGHT TO ANY GENTILE NATION NEVER
- Paul Baptism was under the Law
- There is only [1] permissible Baptism RMS 6:3 THE DRY SPIRT BAPTISM OF ROMANS 6:3
A simple reading of JER, 31:31 describes the NT or properly termed the New Covenant as only being enforced in the Millennial reign of Christ at that time for that specific dispensational group of people, the Gospel was suspended at MAT 16:20.
Jesus ministry was only to the Jews read Hebrews chapters 8 & 9 all Jewish.
The New Covenant or Testament as most refer to is not a collection of books from Matthew to Revelation as tradition has falsely taught us !
The New Covenant is defined by God not by any Church fathers, not any of the Historians, Not any Bible Professors, Not anyone that went to the dead Bible Seminaries, not any so called self proclaimed pastor or minister .... No my friend the Bible the King James Authorized Bible is very clear .
Jeramiah is crystal clear as to what the New Covenant is and is not.. according Almighty God .... and guess what it is not nor will it ever be understood to mean a collection of 27 books as so falsely taught. No my friend the false teaching that due to a 400 year period of silence where God decided to not audibly or spiritually communicate with man does not constitute man deciding what is and what is not Old and New revelations as tradition has taught but somehow not according to Gods will but that of traditions, God somehow decided to Violate his own divine Ordinances and Statutes and Commandments and leave the dividing of his Scriptures to fallen man the Roman Catholic Church as proven in church history.
Another false claim is that of the Greek New Testament scriptures, a Title never given by any of the writers o9f the scriptures as inspired by the Holy spirit of God
Yes the Hebrew scriptures were in fact translated into Greek, but the scriptures from Matthew thru Revelation were simply a Continuation of the Old Covenant scriptures! The fact that a translation occurs from Hebrew to Greek does in no way classify the 27 Jewish epistles as New of anything they are simply a continuation of the Old Testament scriptures regardless of the 400 years of silence .
Some of the New Covenant promises' were mentioned in spirit not in word ....and never ever contained in any entirety in the collection of the 27 books Rome Divided
Which now requires one to question What exactly is really meant by the new covenant of which I will now properly pen as lower case as God in his word did not bring any special emphasis to these words ... That emphasis my friend has occurred due to the publishers and those of traditions... the 2 pages New and Old Testament pages were falsely inserted to wrongly divide our Rightly divided Bible ... so to teach and believe that the 27 books are to be understood as New Testament Theology or Instructions for so called New Testament believers causes one to wrongly divided our Bible and thus be an ashamed workmen according to 2 TIM 2:15 Study to show thyself approved by
This is what God has said so clearly as to what is his new covenant or his new will and I challenge anyone to prove otherwise according to the scriptures of course and not false church traditions and so called church fathers.... Church Fathers as so often referred to ... were never chosen to pen one word of Gods Words ... lets get that straight right now they do not trump or make void the Holy men of God already approved and called to pen the words of God by his Holy spirit
The New Covenant according to the Word of God ... and Not man made Traditions
JER 31:31 Behold, the days come, saith the LORD, that I will make a new covenant with the house of Israel, and with the house of Judah:
JER 31:32 Not according to the covenant that I made with their fathers in the day that I took them by the hand to bring them out of the land of Egypt; which my covenant they brake, although I was an husband unto them, saith the LORD:
JER 31:33 But this shall be the covenant that I will make with the house of Israel; After those days, saith the LORD, I will put my law in their inward parts, and write it in their hearts; and will be their God, and they shall be my people.
JER 31:34 And they shall teach no more every man his neighbor, and every man his brother, saying, Know the LORD: for they shall all know me, from the least of them unto the greatest of them, saith the LORD: for I will forgive their iniquity, and I will remember their sin no more.
JER 31:35 Thus saith the LORD, which giveth the sun for a light by day, and the ordinances of the moon and of the stars for a light by night, which divideth the sea when the waves thereof roar; The LORD of hosts is his name:
JER 31:36 If those ordinances depart from before me, saith the LORD, then the seed of Israel also shall cease from being a nation before me for ever.
JER 31:37 Thus saith the LORD; If heaven above can be measured, and the foundations of the earth searched out beneath, I will also cast off all the seed of Israel for all that they have done, saith the LORD.
JER 31:38 Behold, the days come, saith the LORD, that the city shall be built to the LORD from the tower of Hananeel unto the gate of the corner.
JER 31:39 And the measuring line shall yet go forth over against it upon the hill Gareb, and shall compass about to Goath.
JER31:40 And the whole valley of the dead bodies, and of the ashes, and all the fields unto the brook of Kidron, unto the corner of the horse gate toward the east, shall be holy unto the LORD; it shall not be plucked up, nor thrown down any more for ever.
Millennial reign of Christ only and only for the saved Jews...not a Christian in the bunch..
The following scriptures are proof positive that our Bibles are wrongly divided by man not God, it was man [scholars and theologians, so called Church fathers, historians etc] that have decided what is and what is not to be in the bible . However the Word of God states otherwise . No one can read the following and conclude that the 27 books are to be referred to as New Testament Scriptures. Maybe habit and tradition makes them do it but once you allow the scriptures to explain the scriptures, the Holy spirit has the final say no one elese.
This is the same Biblical precept regarding the Old Testament , which from Genesis 1:1 up until Exodus 19 ;1-8 when and where the Numerical nation of Gentiles are separated by God at Mt Sanai and formed the Jewish Nation of Israel at that time and locale .
Jer 31:31 settles that issue for sure
Another one Hebrews 8:13 In that he saith, A new covenant, he hath made the first old. Now that which decayeth and waxeth old is ready to vanish away.
Hebrews 12:24 And to Jesus the mediator of the new covenant, and to the blood of sprinkling, that speaketh better things than that of Abel.
Mark 14:24 And he said unto them, This is my blood of the new testament, which is shed for many.
Main one 2 Corinthians 3:6 proves not in any books letters or writings Who also hath made us able ministers of the new testament; not of the letter, but of the spirit: for the letter killeth, but the spirit giveth life.
Hebrews 8:7 For if that first covenant had been faultless, then should no place have been sought for the second.
THERE IT IS CLEAR SIMPLE AND UNDERSTANDABLE The new covenant is for the house of ISRAEL & JUDAH not any so called New Testament Christian ::: God couldn't had been any more clearer
The Challenge is on to prove otherwise GOOD LUCK WITH THAT ONE!!!!